Censure and Censorship on the David W Campbell blog

In comments on the David W. Campbell blog:
Back in black… so to speak
April 21st, 2009
---
In response to Anonymous:

“be polite and respectful, or you get the hell out.”

How quaint, and how 1960’s. The musings of someone who has been vilified the most, for his biased unfounded weird views, would want censorship. We know that.

You neglect to mention what started this? Besides the ongoing simmering of posters who post with inaccurate information and who get set straight by my ability with google aided by the number of books I have read. Well believe me, when someone accuses you,out of the blue, for what I already mention several times slipping in one ear and out the other like the numb sensitive bunch you always been, you won’t like it too good. But I knew what this guy was like when I first hit this blog. Someone so without it that even mckenna left him behind.

Well the die been cast, by specious innuendos, by someone to cowardly to retract so I will step up my insults to anyone who tries to post bull, when the correct information is easily accessible.
Again, your opinion, or vote has no value, when there can be no action to take. Again its because your knowledge of computers and internet is as limited as any other subject you venture into. I am just thankful that I am not in that category.

---
Dan Fitzgerald wrote:
Sounds like a lot of nothing about nothing.

I enjoy commenting on Charles' blog because he's got about a dozen topics per day and a fairly active readership.

Mr. Campbell's obvious yet seemingly unconscious corporate lackey spin makes commenting on his posts pretty tempting... Had his policy on comments been more lenient back in the day (see links), I might have been commenting more here, the above rhetoric by the anonymous coward is way less cogent and much more degrading than what I was saying here:

http://davidwcampbell.com/?p=1979
http://censurergeneral.blogspot.com/2008/09/nau-pharmaceutical-benefits-management.html

When did you stop censoring?

On the anniversary of the NB Kleptocrat Pension Swindle

In response to Charles Leblanc: "PISSED OFF FORMER LIBERAL MINISTER VAUGHN IS LOOKING EVERYWHERE FOR SUPPORT TO SAVE THE FERRY AT GAGETOWN!!"

In comments, Dan F said:
I believe this is the only tangible copy of Kleptocrats discussing their pay / pension boost (combined discussion of bills 53 and 54 at around 53 minutes into this recording): http://myginch.com/QSLS/media/qpupload/NB-legislature-300408latenight.mp3

More from my liveblog of that day: http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/nb-tenancy-securities-act.html.

Recall, according to the CBC, the video equipment was 'taken out' by floodwaters the day before - what a bunch of hogwash - the cameras were out that day for the same reason Charles is banned from the building: Kleptocrats can't handle scrutiny of their devious actions.
---

Bill 53 - An Act to Amend the Legislative Assembly Act
http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/pdf/56/2/Bill-53.pdf

(a) by repealing subsection (1) and substituting the
following:

25(1) Commencing April 1, 2008, each member of the Legislative Assembly shall be paid an indemnity at the rate of $85,000 per year.

Since they were on camera for this other bill - they barely mentioned what this law was doing, more salary / pension raises apparently:

Bill 54 - An Act to Amend the Executive Council Act
http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/pdf/56/2/Bill-54.pdf

Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, enacts as follows:

1 Section 5 of the Executive Council Act, chapter E-12 of the Revised Statutes, 1973, is amended
(a) in subsection (1) by striking out “twenty thousand dollars” and substituting “$52,614”;
(b) in subsection (2) by striking out “thirty thousand dollars” and substituting “$79,000".

2 Section 6 of the Act is amended by striking out “fifteen thousand dollars” and substituting “$39,500”.

3 Subsection 6.1(2) of the Act is amended in the portion preceding paragraph (a) by striking out “January 1,

4 This Act shall be deemed to have come into force on April 1, 2008.

Amerika, Drugs and Fake Christians

In general response to:

"Worse than that, the general public might become aware that a nondescript apartment building was also a drug den where underage drinking, dope smoking and other unmentionables were happening on a regular basis."

on the Burton Front - April 15th, 2009 (1)
---
Dan F said:
How's your love-affair going with the US these days Anselm?

http://cryptogon.com/?p=8061

Guess that's what you get when you have several druggies as presidents in a row, eh?

Too bad their puppeteers can't do us all a favour and go get high on grass.

Just about anything would be better than their constant self-enrichment in generating Armageddon and endless wars at everyone else's expense.

Do you think Jesus would take money from arms dealers before he'd smoke a joint?
(Comment Source)

Truth Blogging on CanadaEast's Religious Korner

In response to:
134 CONTROL"
Stephen Porter - Always Learning
March 21, 2009

It is when someone gets thoughts and ideas that are harmful to others peace of mind and are not stopped that problems are created for those people and they have to learn to defend themselves against the unseen forces of gossip, manipulation and lies that their antagonists create and send through others. This grows and grows until mistrust is everywhere in our thoughts and even known truth is not accepted.

Full Article
----
Censurer General wrote:
"It is when someone gets thoughts and ideas that are harmful to others peace of mind and are not stopped that problems are created"

This is how a creationist winds up heading Kanada's science ministry, or priest rapes are allowed to continue for decades, I suppose.

While putting down dissent and rational inquiry through brutality, lies and propaganda of all sort has become de rigueur of late, the truth will always win (however much a pyrrhic victory it must be).

Unfortunately, those the truth threatens have a tendency to spin the words and actions of prophets, philosophers and messiahs alike for their own purposes and personal gain.

Time and time again, we are fooled to the brink of destruction, all to have the same forces raise up again once their calamities have passed.

Konspiracy theory on Irving Blog #1

In comments on Seems Ivan Court was on to something about bias at the Telegraph Journal

Spinks said...
*sigh*
You don't give up with the conspiracy theories do you Dan?

Dan F said...
Not when they're right.

Why else the conspicuous shift to opposing Irving media of late?

We'll see when the chips are down whose interests you serve, Spinks.

Irving hasn't even demanded a new loan yet this winter, that I'm aware of.

But of course, with their hundreds of shell companies, how would one know?

That the above question sounds like conspiracy theory to 90% of my fellow Nieuw Braunschweiggers makes no difference to its relevance vis-a-vis your blog or the politico-economic condition of NB.

Blinded by Science in the NAU & by M$M

In response to:
Who says science is boring?
Alec Bruce - March 3rd, 2009

Let me get this straight. . .

A contingent of two from the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) sits opposite Minister of Science and Technology Gary Goodyear, his policy advisor and one other civil servant, there to receive an earful on subject of ingratitude.

“You are lying,” Goodyear reportedly thunders, evidently enraged by CAUT’s interpretation of the government’s policies on funding basic research.

Full Article
---
Censurer General Says:
March 9th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
Science boring? Not in these ‘interesting’ times.

The psychiatric medication scam of the early 21st century, when it fully comes out, might even overshadow the collective horror 9/11 truth will cause one day.

We’ve got engineered bio-weapons being used to kill liberty in the NAU, Norad troops practicing for more of the same.

Even cconomics and accounting take on mythical proportions when international crime rings have stolen all the money.

Here’s hoping that all the ’sciences’ get out of the business of sustaining kleptocracies, and for an end to screaming headlines based on oft-rigged, unreplicated research protocols.

Or at least doesn’t destroy us all a la LHC, GMO ‘food’ or other insane dual-use technology.

Source

Taliban Harper and discredited media sources

In response to Andrew Krystal / Rogers internet propaganda post Taliban Steve

"In order to avoid defeat – the sunniest possible outcome, different from actually “winning” – the West will have to add more troops and invest heavily in the region"

Censurer General Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Umm... there's a difference between avoiding defeat and prolonging it.

To avoid defeat, the first step is to be very certain that the goals and rationale for a war are concrete and objective respectively.

Regarding the disgusting War of Terror - the shill media has, in large part, been willfully duped for the last 8 years, why would anybody, including Adolf Harper listen to what you have to say on the matter now?

As long as you try to pretend this war was about catching a former western intelligence asset in the caves of Afghanistan, everything that follows is tainted and useless.